| Author |
Message
|
| Sophiapillar |
 Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:40 pm Post subject: Question for Kent Steadman regarding EIT SOHO Anomaly
Description: |
 |
|
Airborne
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 1849
Location: Virgo |
I know this is an old image, but the website where it was posted had a dead link to the explaination of what this anomaly might have been.
Was curious about your thoughts on it....and adding a C3 image from this summer/fall of an anomaly that has a similar shape to the bottom half of the anomaly in the EIT image from 1996.
cropped and enlarged ^^^^^^
inverted colors for definition^^^^^
interesting shaped anomaly from this summer/fall ^^^^^^
enlarged^^^^^
_________________
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
St. Exupery ~ "Little Prince" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| iriskkerry |
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:30 pm Post subject: Question for Kent Steadman regarding EIT SOHO Anomaly
Description: |
|
|
Airborne
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 1515
Age: 58  Gemini
Location: at augustine fl |
I emailed him I'm sure when he gets back online he will answer.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Sophiapillar |
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 8:03 pm Post subject: Question for Kent Steadman regarding EIT SOHO Anomaly
Description: |
|
|
Airborne
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 1849
Location: Virgo |
| iriskkerry wrote: | | I emailed him I'm sure when he gets back online he will answer. |
hey thanks Iris!
_________________
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
St. Exupery ~ "Little Prince" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Kent Steadman |
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:04 pm Post subject: Question for Kent Steadman regarding EIT SOHO Anomaly
Description: |
|
|
Nester
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 732
Location: http://cyberspaceorbit.com/ |
| Quote: | I know this is an old image, but the website where it was posted had a dead link to the explaination of what this anomaly might have been.
Was curious about your thoughts on it |
My notes show:
EMAIL:
Date: 8/29/02 6:31:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time
It was photographed on Feb. 26, 1996. It appears on almost all EIT 284 and EIT 171 pics from feb 26, 1996 - Feb 03, 1998 when it finally vanishes. SOHO was launched on Dec 02, 1995 I believe. It was originally only supposed to be in operation for 2 years. It arrived near the sun in late jan. - early feb. 1996. is it a coincidence that this glowing mass suddenly appears shortly after SOHO starts taking pictures of the sun and disappears just before SOHO's 2 year mission was about to end which was supposed to be in April of 1998 I believe. I think NASA knew this object was going to be at the sun and for only 2 years so they sent SOHO on a 2 year mission to take pictures of it.
Seed Investigation, August, 2002
ORBIT SPECIAL: THE GODS ARE HERE!
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/more_perseus.html
_________________
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Sophiapillar |
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:44 pm Post subject: Question for Kent Steadman regarding EIT SOHO Anomaly
Description: |
|
|
Airborne
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 1849
Location: Virgo |
Thanks Kent....
Interesting information.
Wouldn't you know the object is just enough out of the frame to make it impossible to see the entire shape.
_________________
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
St. Exupery ~ "Little Prince" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Anthony |
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:54 am Post subject: Question for Kent Steadman regarding EIT SOHO Anomaly
Description: |
|
|
tRiCkStEr
Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 12980
Age: 47  Capricorn
Location: England
 |
[quote="Kent Steadman"] | Quote: | I know this is an old image, but the website where it was posted had a dead link to the explaination of what this anomaly might have been.
Was curious about your thoughts on it |
My notes show:
EMAIL:
Date: 8/29/02 6:31:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time
It was photographed on Feb. 26, 1996. It appears on almost all EIT 284 and EIT 171 pics from feb 26, 1996 - Feb 03, 1998 when it finally vanishes. SOHO was launched on Dec 02, 1995 I believe. It was originally only supposed to be in operation for 2 years. It arrived near the sun in late jan. - early feb. 1996. is it a coincidence that this glowing mass suddenly appears shortly after SOHO starts taking pictures of the sun and disappears just before SOHO's 2 year mission was about to end which was supposed to be in April of 1998 I believe. I think NASA knew this object was going to be at the sun and for only 2 years so they sent SOHO on a 2 year mission to take pictures of it.
My question here today is
Has there been any similar event since this occurred.
_________________
" genetic engineering now, is not even close to genetic engineering then" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Kent Steadman |
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:40 am Post subject: Question for Kent Steadman regarding EIT SOHO Anomaly
Description: |
|
|
Nester
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 732
Location: http://cyberspaceorbit.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Guest |
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 11:00 am Post subject: Question for Kent Steadman regarding EIT SOHO Anomaly
Description: |
|
|
|
Your glowing mass seems to have come back this year.
Has anyone figured it out? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
