| Author |
Message
|
| Kent Steadman |
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:36 pm Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 Nester

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 732 Location: http://cyberspaceorbit.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| BrewBasser |
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:58 pm Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 tRiCkStEr

Joined: 18 Jan 2005 Posts: 16580 Age: 42 Scorpio Location: California
 |
Are you implying that a nuclear bomb was used at the twin towers?
If so, why is there no radiation?
MolBasser _________________ <--- Damn straight! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Publius |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:08 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 tRiCkStEr

Joined: 18 Jan 2005 Posts: 10661 Age: 52 Aries Location: Couer des miracles |
How do we know there isn't? D.U. is used as ballast and in the control mechanism of some planes. Further, we do not know what level of tactical nuclear weapons exist as at least prototypes. It would be consistent with the idea about the difficulty of using demolition explosives trucked in by night and rigged quickly and tested in-frequently being able to take those buildings down. After all, the buildings did come down like a controlled demolition and it is very difficult to rig three buildings quickly to to do that. It is even harder to rig them well in advance. Colin Bennet at Combat Diaries UK has a very good article on that.  _________________ I have a different idea of a universal. It is of a universal rich with all that is particular, rich with all the particulars there are, the deepening of each particular, the coexistence of them all.
Aime Cesaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| greggus |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:13 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: wouldn't put it past 'em... |
 |
|
 Airborne

Joined: 21 Apr 2005 Posts: 2283 Age: 48 Sagittarius Location: Southern edge of ecotopia |
back channel stuff that crashed on drives planet wide was NOT completely destroyed. Backups survived, or you wouldn't be seeing what there is to show you. search using
Raw PRC 911 data
links to ch i n a and N o r t h K |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| spook |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:14 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 tRiCkStEr

Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 17566 Location: putting the bang into bangkok! |
choi oiiii!
 _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| BrewBasser |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:17 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 tRiCkStEr

Joined: 18 Jan 2005 Posts: 16580 Age: 42 Scorpio Location: California
 |
| Publius wrote: | How do we know there isn't? D.U. is used as ballast and in the control mechanism of some planes. Further, we do not know what level of tactical nuclear weapons exist as at least prototypes. It would be consistent with the idea about the difficulty of using demolition explosives trucked in by night and rigged quickly and tested in-frequently being able to take those buildings down. After all, the buildings did come down like a controlled demolition and it is very difficult to rig three buildings quickly to to do that. It is even harder to rig them well in advance. Colin Bennet at Combat Diaries UK has a very good article on that.  |
Well, I guess everyone has a theory.
I just wish that the CTers would figure out which one to stand behind.
Planes, no planes.
Controlled demo with thermite (or whaterver), or nuke.
Etc....
MolBasser _________________ <--- Damn straight! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Chaiyah |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:18 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 Amethyst

Joined: 18 Jan 2005 Posts: 25365
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| spook |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:25 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 tRiCkStEr

Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 17566 Location: putting the bang into bangkok! |
this is the most credible theory i've heard. awesome. you know, that morning, when they collapsed, i wondered, why the hell is the rubble pile from these gigantic towers pretty much nil? did the fairys come and carry it all away under cover of the dust? i did not anticipate any of this inside job stuff at the time, i was so shocked. but now i don't believe anything else.
choi oiiii. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Publius |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:25 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 tRiCkStEr

Joined: 18 Jan 2005 Posts: 10661 Age: 52 Aries Location: Couer des miracles |
Actually it is not anyone except the "official story" that has to prove it's point. The STATE removed evidence. Now let us think about a murder scene. I am the police. I murder Fred Hampton in bed. I remove all physical evidence. I blame another party. QED, all parties innocent are guilty. After all, you can no longer prove that I did the crime. All presumptions flow from my perspective. It is unthinkable that the police would murder a man in bed.  _________________ I have a different idea of a universal. It is of a universal rich with all that is particular, rich with all the particulars there are, the deepening of each particular, the coexistence of them all.
Aime Cesaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| greggus |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:27 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 Airborne

Joined: 21 Apr 2005 Posts: 2283 Age: 48 Sagittarius Location: Southern edge of ecotopia |
reported that some of her chi na personell had been xferd to the towers in the two week period prior to event.
Note, however that this does not rule out complicity by our own che if. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| spook |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:29 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 tRiCkStEr

Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 17566 Location: putting the bang into bangkok! |
yup, total crumbly wumblies. all that steel concrete and glass, into a thimble. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Kent Steadman |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:30 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 Nester

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 732 Location: http://cyberspaceorbit.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Publius |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:36 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 tRiCkStEr

Joined: 18 Jan 2005 Posts: 10661 Age: 52 Aries Location: Couer des miracles |
Even better still, it was a mini-nuke. It was a mini-nuke BECAUSE SCHOLARS FOR TRUTH HAS A BYU PROFESSOR WHO AFFIRMS THERMITE. Flowing from the Left-Gatekeeper argument suddenly the bells start to ring. Consider that he is set up to discredit the 9/11 arguments around controlled demolition-like all the Scholars are actually, despite the great affection I have for Peter Dale Scott.
Now there is a call out for-gotta love it, it comes from Prison Planet so ya KNOW of course the HEART is in the right place, the fuckin' WALLET IN OTHER WORDS, for , yes, how droll, LAWYERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH.
God help us. Alex won't. _________________ I have a different idea of a universal. It is of a universal rich with all that is particular, rich with all the particulars there are, the deepening of each particular, the coexistence of them all.
Aime Cesaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| greggus |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:41 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: By Jove, Publius |
 |
|
 Airborne

Joined: 21 Apr 2005 Posts: 2283 Age: 48 Sagittarius Location: Southern edge of ecotopia |
Euruki
you may well have something there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Kent Steadman |
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:48 am Post subject: WTC: DARING TO WHISPER, NUKE Description: |
 |
|
 Nester

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 732 Location: http://cyberspaceorbit.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|